This paper discusses the custom of female genital mutilation (FGM)
and attempts to present a perspective that departs from most literature
on the subject which focuses on medical concerns and political commitment
to abolish the practice. The analytical approach of this study is a contextualized
inquiry that refers to socio-cultural and historical specificities of FGM.
It will examine the specific meanings and values attached to this custom
according to the cultural and ideological contexts within the local networks
of power, and the complex relations that shape women's life.
Following Chandra Mohanty, this essay tries to avoid the analytical trap
of some western ethnocentric assumptions in the representation of third
world women as a homogeneous, coherent group, unfied by the condition of
being oppressed by their patriarchal societies and `traditional' sexist
cultures. In some work by western feminists, third world women have been
constructed as a universal and ahistorical category. They apply the asssumed
validity of this categorization cross-culturally and universally. Third
world women are bound together in a notion of the sameness of their oppression
and exploitation. They are represented as powerless victims of a male dominated
socio-economic system.
The other problematic presupposition of some western feminists is the use
of the monolithic, singular category of patriarchy that does not address
specific historical processes and the dynamics involved in the formation
of networks of power within local societies.
Thus, in the majority of western feminist discourse the complexities of
third world womens lives are homogenized and reductively situated in an
historical structure. The presupposition is that they are constituted as
a separate entity prior to entering into the complex system of social relations,
meanings, and beliefs. Any interaction between these women and the context
of reference is denied as well as their contribution to the formation of
systems of values within it.
Even when writing with varying degrees of accuracy, many feminist texts
carry a similar assumption that victimizes third world women. Women are
defined as victims of Islamic society, victims of colonialism, victims
of the developmental process, or victims of male violence.
In discussing the practice of FGM western feminists such as Fran Hosken
and Mary Daly for example refer to practicing women as both sexually oppressed
and victims of male violence.
Hosken looks at FGM as a form of violence by men against women. She compares
it to rape, battery, forced prostitution, and purdah (segregation of women).
All are seen as "violations of basic human rights" carried out
with "an astonishing consensus among men". In her text women
worldwide become a homogeneous group in a "totalizing rhetoric that
confidentially speaks of the female gender as a universal category".
Women are represented as the victims of male violence and are reduced to
a universal unity based on the reductive notion of their oppression. Even
institutions like purdah or veiling are associated with male violence and
explained in terms of sexual oppression and subjugation. The cultural specificity
and the historical process of the custom is ignored. For example, the difference
between the use of veil in Iran as imposed by Islamic law versus the choice
of veil as a cultural identity element used to oppose western cultural
imperialism. As a symbol of Islamic tradition, the diffusion of veil greatly
increased as a reaction to the intrusive western presence.
Daly has a similar approach to Hosken. She makes a problematic comparison
of customs from different historical periods comparing Africa today with
Europe in the Middle Ages. In particular she parallels FGM to the iron
chastity belts used in medeival Europe, footbinding as practiced in China
until the beginning of this century, and the burial of infant girls alive
in pre-Islamic Arabia. She represents these practices as symptomatic of
a universal misogynist conspiracy. Dalyfalls into the analytical trap of
presuming that a singular, ahistorical patriarchal system characterizes
most societies and structures women as an oppressed group. The structure
of the world is interpreted and defined on dichotomous terms that oppose
women to men.
In analyzing the practice of FGM I describe its various forms, their historical
origins and geographical distribution. The inquiry into the socio-cultural
context involves the examination of religion and moral values as well as
cultural beliefs and traditions within the social and familial structure.
The theoretical assumption is that women are constituted as women through
their complex interaction with culture, religion, systems of meaning and
belief, local networks of power, hierarchies of institutions, and other
ideological frameworks. Women are defined within and by this context under
specific conditions. They themselves contribute to the forming and determining
of these relations in various ways through specific social dimensions.
Even if different and contradictory the social levels are overlapping and
intrinsically interrelated and are separated here only for the purposes
of analytic abstraction.
This paper attempts to respond to the need for a contextualized approach
that avoids judgement by western standards. Westerners tend to view the
custom as a mere act of violence against women that must be abolished.
Moreover, simplistic and reductive formulations that limit the definition
of women to gender identity create "a false sense of commonality of
oppression, intents, and struggles between and among women globally".
Even within a context of commitment to abolish FGM this is not only ineffectual
but counterproductive in organizing efficacious strategies of political
resistence to fight forms of oppression. Beyond `sisterhood' there are
complex cultural conditions and historical specificities to be understood
and respected.
Most authors agree on the classification of FGM, popularly called female
circumcision, into three basic types, a typology which reflects varying
degrees of severity.
Circumcision, which consists of the excision of the prepuce of the clitoris
is the mildest form because it preserves the clitoris and the posterior
larger parts of the labia minora. In Islamic culture, circimcision is known
as sunna which in Arabic means `tradition', because it is recommended by
some Ahadith (sayings of the prophet Muhammad). This is the only form that
can be equated to male circumcision in which the foreskin of the penis
is removed.
Clitoridectomy or excision is the most common form and involves the removal
of the entire clitoris together with all or part of the labia minora. In
classical Arabic this is called khafd which means reduction, and it is
more popularly known by the term tahara which means purification.
Infibulation is the most severe form of the practice. The term derives
from the latin fibula, the pin used to clasp the Romantoga. The fibula
was also used to prevent sexual intercourse among slaves. It was fastened
through the labia majora of the women, and through the prepuce of men.
This was to ensure female slaves' faithfulness, to avoid childbearing which
would have hindered their work, and to prevent male slaves or gladiators
from tiring themselves with women. Infibulation is also known as `pharaonic
circumcision', because it is believed that it was practiced in Egypt during
the Pharaohs dynasties (2850-525 B.C.).
Infibulation involves the excision of the clitoris, the labia minora, and
the labia majora. The remaining edges of the labia majora are then sewn
together in such a way that the vaginal orifice is closed. A small sliver
of wood is inserted into the vagina during the healing process to allow
for the passage of urine and menstrual blood. According to different customs,
the wound is sewn with silk, catgut sutures (in the Sudan) or acacia thorns
(in Somalia). To facilitate healing, adhesive substances are used such
as mal-mal (a paste mixture made from sugar and gum), egg-yolk and sugar,
lemon juice or herbal mixtures. To help the healing process and dissipate
the bad odors resulting from urine and the coagulation of blood, traditional
aromatic herbs (e.g. asal) and dried sap are burned below the child. Ashes
used to control bleeding, especially in the rural areas of West Africa
are often the cause of acute infections. After the operation the girls'
legs are tied together and she is immobilized for several weeks until the
wound of the vulva heals. On the nuptial night, the scarred genitals have
to be defibulated to allow for penetration. After each birth reinfibulation
is generally performed to restore the woman's body to its `premarital condition'.
The instruments used to perform FGM include knives, razor blades, scissors,
and broken glass. These instruments are rarely sterilized before the operation
and, except in hospitals, anesthesia is almost never used. Traditionally
the operation is performed by elder women, usually local midwives known
as Gedda in Somalia or Daya in Egypt and the Sudan. These operations constitute
a lucrative source of income for the midwives. In Mali and Senegal it is
carried out by women of the blacksmith caste gifted with knowledge of the
occult. In urban areas of these countries, the operations are often performed
in hospitals by medical professionals.
The age for circumcision varies both geographically and ethnically. Even
if the age for the practice ranges from one week old to approximately twenty
years, it occurs most often on young girls between the ages of three and
eight. Recently there has been a tendency towards an even earlier age in
order to minimize the resistance to the extreme pain. Verzin (1975) has
summarized the ages at which female circumcision is performed as follows:
eight days after birth - Ethiopia; ten weeks after birth - Arabia; three
to four years (circumcision and excision) - Somalia; three to eight years
- Egypt; five to eight years - The Sudan; eight to ten years (infibulation)
- Somalia; shortly after marriage - Masai tribes.
The origin of FGM is unknown. There is no conclusive evidence to indicate
when and where the custom started and how it spread. There is no consensus
if the operations originated in one locality and then spread, or if they
were practised by different ethnic groups in different areas at different
times. However there are two main theories regarding the origins of the
practice. One is that it began in one place (the Arabian peninsula or Egypt)
and spread. The other argues that this is quite unlikely because the operations
are so widespread that they could not have had a common origin. For the
authors supporting the latter theory, the practice developed independently
in different places at different periods in history.
It seems that in all societies where female excision is practiced, male
circumcision is also performed. Male circumcision is represented in reliefs
of the Egyptian tomb of Ankh-Ma Hor of the sixth Dynasty (2340-2180 B.C.)
and in other Egyptian representations of pharaonic times. But whether excision
and infibulation had a parallel development is unclear. By the time of
the first millennium B.C., however, there is evidence that the custom was
certainly practiced in Egypt. The oldest known source that records the
custom is the work of Herodotus (484-424 B.C.). He states that excision
was practised by the Phoenicians, Hittites, and Ethiopians as well as the
Egyptians. Circa 25 B.C., Strabo, the Greek geographer and historian, reports
that the Egyptians circumcised their boys and excised their girls. Evidence
is also found in the medical literature. Soramus, a Greek physician who
practiced about 138 A.D. in Alexandria and Rome, supplies a detailed description
of the operation of excision in Egypt and of the instruments used. Another
physician, Aetius (502-575 A.D.), describes the operation in a similar
fashion. Both state that the purpose was the reduction of female sexual
desire.
Moreover some archaeologists claim that the well preserved Egyptian mummies
attest to the presence of clitoridectomy. It is also generally agreed rîat
excision was practiced mostly by the ruling class. It was a sign of distinction
for the females of royal families and the priestly cast of Egypt. Women
were thought to be the only possessors of magic, and FGM was an attempt
to obtain control over this magic power.
According to some sources, Jews and Arabs aquired the practices of clitoridectomy
and infibulation in Egypt. During the Arab conquest of North Africa, the
practice was picked up and spread to other parts of the world.
FGM is practiced primarily by Muslims but also by Christians, Animists,
atheists and Jews (only by Fellashas living near Gondar in Ethiopia). The
practice is widespread in areas where poverty, illiteracy and unsanitary
conditions predominate, and where the economic and social standing of women
is low. It is practiced in more than twenty-six countries of the African
continent and in some areas of the Arabian peninsula and Asia.
As shown in the map below, FGM is present across Africa between the tropic
of Cancer and the Equator. Excision is documented in the southern part
of the Arabian peninsula and around the Persian Gulf, including South Yemen,
Oman, the Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Infibulation is practiced by Muslims
in Somalia, in those areas inhabited by Somalis in Ethiopia, Kenya, and
Djibouti, in the Sudan (with the exception of non-Muslim inhabitants of
the southern province), in northern Nigeria, and in parts of Mali.
The mildest forms of FGM are performed in Asia by the Muslim populations
of Malaysia and Indonesia. They are probably tied to Islamization.
According to some authors, the practice has also been found among the aboriginal
tribes of Australia as well as in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Peru, Brazil, eastern
Mexico, and Russia. But these are sporadic and isolated incidents.
The practice is not only characteristic of non-western societies. African
immigrants have brought these practices to the United States and Europe,
especially Great Britain and France.
In the attempt to explain the reasons behind FGM, I will examine: a) the
association with religion, b) cultural beliefs and body image, and c) tradition.
a) Although FGM is not central to the teaching of the three monotheistic
religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) to which practicing groups
belong, it is believed that the practice is a religious requirement. The
most common response given for the justification of the practice is to
abide to religious mandates. The religion which has embraced the practice
most in its culture is Islam. Although the custom did not originate in
Islam, its strength lies in Islamic traditions.
With the rise of Islamic traditions such as the veil and seclusion, FGM
gained significance. This is not only because some Ahadith are in favor
of sunna but it is also because Islam as most other religions regards female
sexuality as a lustful instinct which must be controlled. Great importance
is given to women's `modesty' and `chastity'. Thus, although FGM is not
prescribed by the Quran, it became more widespread in Muslim cultures than
elsewhere. The custom however is not followed by all Muslims, as in the
examples of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and Libya.
The common view, supported by religions, that women's sexuality needs to
be controlled, considers sex as something shameful which can only be practiced
within the framework of an official marriage for reproductive purposes.
`Sexual purity' of a woman represents the honor of the family. Any violation
of it is condemned by her family and society .
Thus the removal of females external genital organs is a measure to reduce
sexual desire which is necessary to protect her virginity, her honor, and
to enforce fidelity. It is also considered necessary to prevent masturbation
which is forbidden by Islamic law.
Clitoridectomy and infibulation were not prescribed by the Quran but have
come to be associated with it. In one hadith, it is reported that the prophet
Mohammed told a woman in Medina who wanted to undergo the operation: "Touch
but not destroy. It is more illuminating to the woman and more enjoyable
to the husband" and in another statement the prophet says: "Do
not go deep. This is enjoyable to the woman and preferable to the husband
(Abdulla)". These statements confirm the positive attitude of Islamic
holy scriptures towards sexuality rather than the reverse.
Another hadith attributed to the Prophet states that circumcision is a
necessity for men but only an `embellishment' for women.
FGM is found also among Christians and Jews. These patriarchal religions
also share the belief that women's sexuality must be repressed because
it is essentially sinful and incites temptation. Women are thought to be
more disposed to passion and emotions than to reason and rational conduct.
Even in these religions the practice is not mandated by holy scriptures.
Misinterpretations of religious principles helped to legitimize it.
b) In addition to religion, many views have been advanced to explain FGM
within the context of ancient cultures. According to one view, the practice
has been interpreted as an offering or sacrifice to the deity presiding
over fertility. Suggesting another possible explanation, Meinardus (1967)
relates it to the Pharaonic belief in the bisexuality of gods. Hence the
belief that every person is endowed with masculine and feminine souls.
Societies which believe in the duality and androgynous nature of children
feel that the female side of a boys nature resides in the foreskin of the
penis and the male side of a girls nature resides in the clitoris. As a
part of the rite of passage into the adult world, adolescents have to lose
the symbols of their sexual duality so as to assume their adult roles.
Genital alteration accomplishes the social definition of a child's sex
and the affirmation of gender identity.
In Mali, the Bambara and the Dogon believe that children have two souls.
The `boy's female soul' resides in the prepuce, the female sexual element,
and the `girl's male soul' is in the clitoris, the male sexual element.
Both girls and boys are considered polluted because they have both female
and male elements. Thus male circumcision is needed to remove the female
aspect of boy's anatomy while clitoridectomy removes the phallic aspect
of women's sexual anatomy. The prepuce and the clitoris are considered
to be the seat of an evil force of disorder called Wanzo which prevents
fertility and entrance into the world of adults. Therefore circumcision
serves a dual purpose in affirming gender identity and destroying the malefic
power.
Some scholars explain the practice in terms of initiation rites, as a passage
from puberty into adulthood. In the tradition of many ethnic groups ( in
Northern Sudan, Kikuyu in Kenya, Toguana in the Ivory Coast, Bambara in
Mali), an elaborate ceremony surrounds the event with rituals full of symbolisms
(songs, dances, special clothing and food). In the Sudan the girl to be
operated on is called arusa, the `young bride', refering "to the future
connection with marriage and the expected sexual role of the future wife".
She is dressed like a bride, with gold jewels and is adorned with henna.
Women who participate in the ceremony encourage the girl with zagarid (ululation
for a joyous occasion). After the operation the child is laid on a bed
and decorated with red threads, a pearl necklace and a scarab that are
believed to speed up the healing process and to protect her from evil.
The girls receive gifts of money, gold and clothing. The gifts of the elaborate
ceremony as well as peer pressure serve as powerful enticements to young
girls.
Some tribes take the girl to a river, preferably at sunset, which is also
a form of mushahra (treatment) for the state of kabsa (ritual danger) which
affects newly circumcised girls. The celebration, which follows a similar
pattern for all social classes, still continues today.
In other areas such as Somalia the ritual is much less elaborate. The ceremony
includes tea, sweets and porridge with ghee (butter). During the operation
the relatives and women attending the event chant, sing and shout to cover
the cries of the victim and to offer emotional support. After the procedure
the girl must remain indoors for a period of forty days in order to be
protected from jinns (evil influences) which are likely to attack in the
period following an important event (circumcision, wedding, birth, or funeral).
In urban areas the operation takes place during the school holidays (from
July to October). In rural areas the customary period is late spring or
autumn because it is the end of the rainy season and the girls are then
well nourished and able to tolerate the operation.
Some ethnic groups such as the Tagouana of the Ivory Coast believe, instead,
that circumcision enhances fertility. Ironically, however, the operation
is often the cause of severe health problems that can result in sterility.
Some other tribes like the Mossi of Upper Volta and the Dogon of Mali believe
that the clitoris is a dangerous organ. It is believed that contact during
delivery will result in the childs death. The Bambara of Mali believe that
the clitoris can kill a man if it comes into contact with his penis during
intercourse.
Another rationale for the practice is the belief that `clitoridectomy'
is necessary to become `clean' and `pure'. Especially in countries of eastern
Africa (Egypt, the Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia), the external female genitalia
are considered dirty. In Egypt, for instance, the uncircumcised girl is
called nigsa (unclean), and in Sudan the colloquial term for circumcision
is tahur (cleansing, purification).
In Mali, the clitoris is also considered `ugly' which is a justification
for excision. Even in Mauritania, clitoridectomy is done for beauty and
is known as tizian which means to make more beautiful and gaad which means
to cut off and make even.
As seen above, the concept of beauty and body image varies from culture
to culture. Following are accounts of different customs around the globe
that involve body modification realized on the basis of specific socially
constructed ideas of beauty. "All cultures have their own notion about
how the body should be shaped, sized and decorated. The images of what
a `good' body should look like are unbelievably varied. The modal body
appearance in one group may seem to be not at all human to a representative
of another group".
Ethnic groups in West Africa, Australia, New Guinea, New Zealand, Melanesia,
and Polinesia tattooe their faces with scars. Instead of using tints, they
carve symbolic designs into their flesh. The operation is so painful and
the face so swollen that they need to receive nourishment using special
funnels.
In New Zealand both Maori women and men practice tattooing not only on
their faces but also on their thighs and buttocks. Tattooing is a long
and painful operation performed by specially trained craftsmen who use
the ushi, a thin and pointed instrument with a cutting edge of varying
widths. The conclusion of the operation is often marked by a social function
and a ceremonial feast.
Some native populations living in villages of the Brazilian Amazon practice
lip and ear enlargement. The Ge, Tchikrin and Kayapo perforate the babies
ears with large, cigar-shaped earplugs. At weaning time, the lips of the
boys are pierced and gradually enlarged.
Painful body `improvements' are also widespread in western countries. `Cosmetic'
surgery, including breast reduction or augmentation, liposuction, and facelifts,
are widely performed because of a specific body image.
c) Tradition is also a widely held justification for the persistance of
FGM. It is regularly performed as an integral part of social conformity
and in line with community identity. It is extremely rare for a traditional
family to question the essence of the custom which is supported by deep-rooted
tradition. Tradition is taken for granted, "it carries its own validity
and the status quo is never questioned". It seems that `reasons' are
rationalizations that try to explain a practice that "has woven itself
into the fabric of some societies so completely that `reasons' are no longer
particularly relevant, since invalidating them does not stop the practice".
FGM is deeply rooted in underdeveloped countries where illiteracy and poverty
are widespread and women have to struggle daily for survival and for satisfying
basic needs. They grow up within the context of their cultural norms. They
live with the assumption that an uncircumcised girl is unacceptable and
will not be sought out for marriage, almost the only solution for securing
a future. In a culture where deep-rooted values of premarital chastity
and marriage are intrinsically linked to FGM, physical suffering is preferred
to the social ostracism experienced by an uncircumcised girl. This explains
why women are the strongest proponents of the practice and why the sufferings,
danger of death and severe infections are often seen as preferable to being
an uncircumcised outcast.
The subject of FGM has been buried in secrecy and taboo for several centuries.
It has been brought to the surface recently by feminists, health pratictioners,
and social scientists. The practice elicited reaction from the west in
the form of indignation, horror, and condemnation. While, on the one hand,
this helped to break the silence surrounding the subject, on the other,
without recognition of the complexity and sensitiveness of the issue, it
widened the gap between western feminist movements and those of the Third
World. The West views FGM as a form of torture and as a violation of the
most basic human rights.
The reaction of indignation from the west was rejected as imperialistic,
ignorant, and aggressive. Some African feminists criticized the western
campaign against the practice for their `ignorance' and for "the total
lack of consideration of the particular context in which African women
are struggling ". The response was that "it is essentially up
to African people and in particular African women to decide to mobilize
and fight against certain aspects of their reality - those which seem most
urgently in need of change, and to decide how that struggle should be waged".
They stressed the right of cultural difference and the defence of traditional
values. This view denies westerners the right to interfere with cultural
problems.
Western feminists opposing the practice came to understand that no change
is possible without the conscious participation of African women. Campaigns
started to be organized with more sensitivity and better understanding
of the socio-cultural context. The complexity of the problem requires a
multidisciplinary approach of a comprehensive nature. A successful campain
demands a combination of legislative and educational interventions supported
by religious and civil leaders with influential positions in their communities.
During the colonial period, attempts to abolish the practice through legislation
were counter productive. Initially colonial governments avoided interfering
in the local customs of these societies to prevent tension. When they did
intervene, as in the Sudan and Kenya, they faced a great deal of local
resentment and opposition. The special laws promulgated were interpreted
as a threat to national solidarity and an interference of the cultural
and social order. The laws were never accepted and the practice became,
instead, a symbol of resistance to foreign influence. Even in other countries
FGM became a symbol of national identity, tradition, and authenticity.
Post-independence national governments also tried to eliminate FGM through
the legal system. For the most part, however, legislation did not produce
much change and the custom continued to be practiced underground. In countries
like Egypt and Eritrea, infibulation and clitoridectomy decreased, but
not as a result of legislation. In Egypt under Nasser, women acquired equal
opportunities in education and work. In Eritrea, infibulation was banned
through campaigns of Eritrean People's Liberation Front joined by many
young girls.
In the late 1970's the subject become a matter of international concern.
The practice was discussed extensively in conferences organized by international
organizations such as the WHO (World Health Organization), UNICEF (United
Nations Children Fund), UNESCO (United Nation Educational Scientific and
Cultural Organization), and various women's organizations. By 1982 the
position of the WHO had become very clear and determined. It claimed "that
governments should adopt clear national policies to abolish female circumcision,
and to intensify educational programs to inform the public about the harmfulness
of female circumcision. In particular women's organizations at local levels
are encouraged to be involved, since without women themselves being aware
and committed, no changes are likely". The WHO and UNICEF assured
governments of their readiness to support national efforts against FGM
and to continue collaborating on research, educational programs, and diffusion
of information.
The political commitment of feminists and international groups to abolish
the custom must understand the specific context to effectively organize
to change it. Eurocentric attitudes still embedded in western culture should
be recognized and avoided.
Every culture follows its own moral precepts and has its own view. Most
perceptions of human rights do not correspond to those expressed in the
context of western debates. The practice of FGM is performed by women who
strongly believe in it. FGM is not perceived as a `mutilation' but, on
the contrary, it is thought to be in the best interest of the woman. In
Renteln's words: "Culture is so powerful in the way it shapes individuals'
perceptions that understanding the way of life in other societies depends
on gaining insight into what might be called the inner cultural logic".
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abdalla Raqiya Haji Dualeh, (1982), Sisters in Affliction: Circumcision
and Infibulation of Women in Africa, London: Zed Press
Ammar Hammed, (1954), Growing up in an Egyptian Village, London: Routledge
Anti-Slavery Reporter, "Female Circumcision and WHO", Series
VII, Vol. XIII, No. 2, 1985
Armstrong, Sue, (1991), "Female Circumcision: Fighting a Cruel Tradition",
New Scientist, 2 Feb.
Armstrong, Sue, (1990) "Female Circumcision: Call to Outlaw Needless
Mutilation", New Scientist, Vol. 128, Dec. 15
Assaad Maria Bassili, (1980), "Female Circumcision in Egypt: Social
Implications, Current Research and Prospects for Change", Studies
in Family Planning, Vol. XI, 1, pp. 3-16
Auffret, Severine, (1982), Des Couteaux Contres des Femmes, Des Femmes,
Paris
Barnes-Dean Virginia, (1985), "Clitoridectomy and Infibulation",
Cultural Survival Quarterly, Vol. IX, no. 2
Best Elsdon, (1952), The Maori as He Was: A Brief Account of Maori Life
as it was in pre-European days, Wellington: Owen, Government Printer
Boddy Janice, (1989), Wombs and Alien Spirits: Women, Men and the Zar Cult
in Northern Sudan, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press
Bouhdiba A., (1975), La Sexualite' en Islam, Paris: Presses Universitaires
de France
Bowlware-Miller Kay, (1985), "Female Circumcision: Challenges to the
Practice as a Human Rights Violation," Harvard Women's Law Journal,
Vol. 8
Brown Judith, (1963), "A Cross-Cultural Study of Female Initiation
Rites", American Anthropologist, 65
Brown J., (1971), "Initiation Rites for Girls: A Further Reply",
American Anthropologist, Vol. 23
Bullough Vern, (1974), The Subordinate Sex: A History of Attitudes toward
Women, Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Cloudsley Anne, (1983), Women of Omdurman: Life, Love and the Cult of Virginity,
London: Ethnographica
Constantinides P., (1985), "Women Heal Women: Spirit Possession and
Sexual Segregation in a Muslim Society", Social Science and Medicine,
Vol. 21, No. 6
Cook R., (1976), "Damage to Physical Health from Pharaonic Circumcision
(Infibulation) of Females. A Review of the Medical Literature", WHO
EMRO Technical Publications, No.2
Coquery-Vidrovitch Catherine, (1994), Les Africaines: Histoire des Femmes
d'Afrique noire du XIX au XX siecle, Paris: Editions Desjonqueres
Cutner Lawrence, (1985), "Female Genital Mutilation," Obstetrical
and Gynecological Survey, Vol. 40, No. 7
Daly Mary, (1978), GYN/ECOLOGY: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, Boston:
Beacon Press
Datta V. N., (1988), Sati: A Historical, Social and Philosophical Enquiry
into the Hindu Rite of Widow Burning, Riverdale: The Riverdale Company
Davies Miranda, (1984), Third World - Second Sex: Women's Struggle and
National Liberation, London: Zed Books
Daw Edward, (1970), "Female Circumcision and Infibulation Complicating
Delivery", The Practitioner, 204, pp. 559-563
Diallo K., (1984), "Excision and Female Circumcision: Mali's Experience",
WHO EMRO Technical Publications: Seminar on Traditional Practices Affecting
the Health of Women ad Children in Africa
Dirie M. A., (1985), Female Circumcision in Somalia: Medical and Social
Implications, Mogadishu: SOMAC SAREC
Dorkenoo Efua, and Scilla Elworthy, (1992), Female Genital Mutilation:
Proposal for Change, London: Minority Rights Group
El Dareer Asma, (1983), "Attitudes of Sudanese People to the Practice
of Female Circumcision", International Journal of Epidemiology 12,
no. 2
El Dareer Asma, (1982), Woman, Why Do You Weep?: Circumcision and its Consequences,
London: Zed Press
Eliade Mircea, (1958), Rites and Symbols of Initiation: The Mysteries of
Birth and Rebirth, New York: Harper and Row, Publishers Inc.
El Saadawi Nawal, (1980), The Hidden Face of Eve: Women in the Arab World,
London: Zed Books Ltd.
Esposito John, (1980), Islam: The Straight Path, New York: Oxford University
Press
Epelboin Sylvia, (1979), Female Circumcision: Special Report", People,
Vol. 6, No.1
Fisher Seymmour, (1986), Development and Structure of the Body Image, Volume
1, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Ghaliongui P., (1973), The House of Life per Ankh Magic and Medicine Science
in Ancient Egypt, Amsterdam: B. M. Israel
Goldstein Laurence ed., (1991), The Female Body: Figures, Styles, Speculations,
Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press
Gosta Widstrand Carl, (1964), Female Infibulation, in: Studia Ethnographica
Upsaliensia: Varia I, Uppsala
Harris C., (1985), "The Cultural Decision-Making Model: Focus-Circumcision,"
Health Care for Women International, Vol. 6, No.1-3
Healey T., (1979), "Historical Aspects of Female Circumcision: Sexual
Sacrifice", British Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol. 8
Hicks Esther, (1993), Infibulation: Female Mutilation in Islamic Northeastern
Africa, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers
Hosken Fran, (1982), Female Sexual Mutilation: the Facts and Proposals
for Action, Lexinghton, MA, Women's International Networks News
Hosken Fran, (1978),"The Epidemiology of Female Genital Mutilation",
Tropical Doctor, 8, pp. 150-156
Hosken Fran, (1979), "Women and Health: Female Circumcision",
WIN News, 4 (3), 27
Hosken Fran, (1982),The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of
Females, Lexington, MA: Women's International Network News
Huber A., (1966), "Female Circumcision and Infibulation in Ethiopia",
Acta Tropica 23,1
Ismail Ellen, and Maureen Makki, (1990), Women of the Sudan, Koeln:
Ligthfooot-Klein Hanny, (1989), Prisoners of Ritual: an Odyssey into Female
genital Circumcision in Africa, New York: Haworth Press
Lightfoot-Klein Hanny, (1989), "The Sexual Experience and Marital
Adjustment of Genitally Circumcised and Infibulated Females in the Sudan",
The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 26
Longo Lawrence, (1964), "Sociocultural practices relating to Obstetrics
and Gynecology in a community of West Africa", Obstetrics and Gynecology
in West Africa, Vol. 82, No 4, pp. 470-475
Mahran M., (1980), "Les Risques Medicaux de L'Excision", Bulletin
Medical de L'IPPF (International Planned Parenthood Federation), Vol. 15
Mathieu J., (1970), "Les Mutilations Sexuelles", in Pathologie
de la Vulve, Paris
McLean Scilla and Stella Efua Graham, (1985), Female Circumcision, Excision
and Infibulation: the Facts and Proposals for Change, Minority Rights Group,
London
Meinardus Otto, (1967), "Mythological, Historical, and Sociological
Aspects of the Practice of Female Circumcision among Egyptians", Acta
Ethnographica: Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 387-397
Mohanty Chandra, (1982), "Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship
and Colonial Discourses", Boundary, 12/13, 333-34
Mohanty Chandra, Ann Russo and Lourdes Torres ed., (1991), Third World
Women and the Politics of Feminism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Melly J. M., (1935), "Infibulation", Lancet, 2,1272
Muge Gocek Fatma and Shiva Balaghi, Ed. (1994), Reconstructing Gender in
the Middle-East: Tradition, Identity, and Power, New York: Columbia University
Press
Mustafa G., (1966), "Female Circumcision and Infibulation in the Sudan",
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 73,
302-306
Ogunmodede Esther, (1979), "Women against Mutilation", Development
Forum
Pieters Guy and Albert Lowenfels, (1977), "Infibulation in the Horn
of Africa", New York State Journal of Medicine, pp. 729-731
Randolph Richard, David Schneider and May Diaz, (1988), Dialectics and
Gender: Anthropological Approaches, Boulder: Westview Press
Rentel Alison, (1990), International Human Rights: Universalism Versus
Relativism, Newbury Park: Sage Publications
Rose Oldfield Hayes, (1974), "Female Genital Mutilation, Fertility
Control, Women's Role, and the Patrilineage in Modern Sudan: A Functional
analysis", American Ethnologist
Salih al-Tayyib, (1970), Seasons of migration to the North, London: Heineman
Sanderson Passmore Lilian, (1981), Against the Mutilation of Women: the
Struggle to End Unnecessary Suffering, London: Ithaca Press
Sanderson Passmore Lilian, (1985), "Female Circumcision", Anti-Slavery
Newsletter, No. 4
Sanderson Passmore Lilian, (1986), Female Genital Mutilation, Excision
and infibulation: a Bibliography, London: The Anti-Slavery Society for
the Protection of Human Rights
Saurel Renee, (1985), Bouches Cousues: Les Mutilations Sexuelles Feminines
et le Milieu Medical, Tierce, Paris
Schwimmer Eric, (1966), The World of the Maori, Wellington: A. H. &
A. W. Reed
Sequeira James, (1931), "Female Circumcision and Infibulation",
The Lancet II, 1054-1055
Shandall Ahmed Abu-el-Futuh, (1967), "Circumcision and Infibulation
of Females", Sudan Medical Journal, 5, 178-212
Slack Alison, (1988), "Female Circumcision: A Critical Appraisal",
Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. X, No.4
Sochart Elise, (1988), "Agenda Setting, the Role of Groups and the
Legislative Process: the Prohibition of Female Circumcision in Britain",
Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 41
Sochart Elise, (1987), Legislating Against Female Circumcision: Social
Reform or Placebo Politics, Glasgow, University of Strathclyde
Taba A. H., (1979), "Female Circumcision", World Health,121
Taba A. H., (1980),"Female Circumcision", Tropical Doctor,10,10-23
Taoko J., (1975), "L'Excision: base de la Stabilite' Familiale ou
Rite Cruel?", Famille et developpement, No. 2, United Nations, Femal
Circumcision is a Health Hazard, International Year of the Child Report
Number 9
Toubia Nahid, (1994), "Female Circumcision as a Public Healyh Issue",
The New England Journal of Medicine, 13-15-1994
Toubia Nahid, (1993), Female Geniytal Mutilation: A Call for Glabal Action,
New York: Women Ink.
Trimingham J., (1949), Islam in the Sudan, London: Oxford University Press
Turner Terence, (1993), "The Social Skin", Burroughs Catherine
and Jeffrey Ehrenreich, Reading the Social Body, Iowa City: University
of Iowa Press
Verzin J. A., (1975), "Sequelae of Female Circumcision", Tropical
Doctor, 5, pp. 163-169
Vlahos Olvia, (1979), Body the Ultimate Symbol, New York: J. B. Lippincott
Company
Weil B., and K. Lavencie, (1978), "The Painful Price of Pleasing a
Male", The Middle East, No. 41
Whyte A., (1991), "Female Circumcision Exposed in Britain", The
Geographical Magazine, Vol. 63
WHO, (1986), "A Traditional Practice that Threatens Health-Female
circumcision", WHO Chronicle, Vol. XL
Widstrand C., (1964), "Female Infibulation", Studia Ethnographica
Uppsalensia, 20
Worsley Allan, (1938), "Infibulation and Female Circumcision: A Study
of a Little-Known Custom", Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of
the British Empire, 45, 4, pp. 686-691
Wright H., (1980), "Medical Dangers of Female Circumcision",
International Planned Parenthood Federation Medical Bulletin
|

|